Why owners keep employees AI could replace
33%
33% gave loyalty main reason for not replacing an employee with AI — the most common answer.
n = 3,022 U.S. small-business owners · Fielded 2026 · Cherry Data Signals
Breakdown
loyalty33%
long service17%
hard-to-replace company knowledge13%
responsibility for the employee's financial wellbeing12%
customer relationships12%
0%50%100%
Methodology
- Sample
- 3,022
- Population
- U.S. small-business owners
- Country
- United States
- Fielded
- 2026
- Research by
- Cherry Data Signals
- Study
- Why Small Businesses Keep Staff AI Could Replace
Cite this statistic
Cherry Data Signals (2026). "Why owners keep employees AI could replace" Survey of 3,022 U.S. small-business owners, United States. https://cherrysignals.com/statistics/why-owners-keep-employees-ai-could-replace
Free to reproduce with attribution to Cherry Data Signals and a link to this page.
Related statistics
- AI could already perform a meaningful proportion of at least one employee's work61%
- How much cheaper AI must be before owners would switch24%
- Delayed introducing AI because of its possible impact on employees61%
- Rejected a specific AI tool because it could cause job losses59%
- Most protective of long-serving employees28%
- The employees owners feel most protective of22%
- Employers should protect jobs wherever reasonably possible; 31% favored protection even if profits fell47%
- Business survival should take priority; 7% favored AI adoption whenever financially beneficial15%
Need an original statistic for your own story?
Explore Survey ResearchResearch by Cherry Data Signals